------------------ WORK IN PROGRESS ------------------
An interesting alternative to the modeling of the wake by flat panels is the Lagrangian description based on discrete vortex particles.
A theoretical description of the Vortex Particle Wake (VPW) can be found in the following documents:
The idea of the method is to:
This approach offers several advantages which make it attractive for an implementation in a panel solver:
The VPW model implemented in flow5 beta 12 is essentially the one described in the documents referenced above with the main following deviations.
The potential part of the wake is made of 3 rows of "buffer wake panels" ended by a "negating vortex" which cancels the end effect of the last downstream wake panel.
Each vorton is described by its position in space and its vorticity vector. The amplitude of the vector is the vorton's circulation which is set when the vorton leaves the trailing wake panel.
It is recommended in the first reference document to adapt the body's mesh and the buffer wake panels so that the elements share a common edge. This is intended to avoid numerical problems and to have a "body abutting wake".
The evaluation of the induced drag is something very tricky in panel methods, and the result depends on the calculation method, on the wake representation and on its converged shape.
As stated by Mark Drela in "Flight Vehicle Aerodynamics", M.I.T. 2014, paragraph 5.6: "The induced drag expression is seen to be the crossflow kinetic energy (per unit distance) deposited by the body. This energy is provided by part of the body's propelling force working against the induced drag. The remaining part works again the profile drag."
The problem of estimating the induced drag therefore translates into the estimation of the kinetic energy in the crossflow plane. Given the chaotic nature of the streamlines for anything other than a simple standalone wing, this evaluation can be quite problematic.
Sensitivity analyses have been performed on a simple case to establish tentative guidelines for the VPW settings. The project file used to perform these analyses can be downloaded here.
A critical parameter of an analysis involving a VPW is the vorton core size associated to the mollification function. The purpose of the mollification factor is to damp out numerical divergences which are caused by the absence of viscosity modelling in the analysis. The vorton core size can therefore be seen as an artificial or arbitrary correction factor, and as a consequence should be as small as possible to minimize this correction. However too small a size will cause the wake to become chaotic, and a too large size will excessively damp the wake's roll-up.
Since the vorton core size has a significant influence on the results, it has been moved from a global setting to an analysis specific parameter starting in flow5 v7.01 beta15.